Maretz v. 595 Corporate Circle

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Maretz v. 595 Corporate Circle

753 A.2d 940, 253 Conn. 906, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 160

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMay 4, 2000

DocketSC 16304

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 753 A.2d 940 (Maretz v. 595 Corporate Circle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maretz v. 595 Corporate Circle, 753 A.2d 940, 253 Conn. 906, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 160 (Colo. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 815 (AC 18716), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that a real estate listing agreement was unenforceable under General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 20-325a on the ground that the signatures of the general partners of the partnership ownership of the property were not acknowledged and witnessed?

[907]*907The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16304. Edwin L. Doemberger, in support of the petition. James C. Graham, in opposition. Decided May 4, 2000

“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the amendments to General Statutes § 20-325a, enacted by No. 94-240 of the 1994 Public Acts, did not apply to real estate listing agreements signed prior to the effective date?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 815 (AC 18716), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that a real estate listing agreement was unenforceable under General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 20-325a on the ground that the signatures of the general partners of the partnership ownership of the property were not acknowledged and witnessed?

[907]*907The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16304. Edwin L. Doemberger, in support of the petition. James C. Graham, in opposition. Decided May 4, 2000

“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the amendments to General Statutes § 20-325a, enacted by No. 94-240 of the 1994 Public Acts, did not apply to real estate listing agreements signed prior to the effective date?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

753 A.2d 940, 253 Conn. 906, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maretz-v-595-corporate-circle-conn-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack