Maretz v. 595 Corporate Circle
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 815 (AC 18716), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that a real estate listing agreement was unenforceable under General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 20-325a on the ground that the signatures of the general partners of the partnership ownership of the property were not acknowledged and witnessed?
“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the amendments to General Statutes § 20-325a, enacted by No. 94-240 of the 1994 Public Acts, did not apply to real estate listing agreements signed prior to the effective date?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
753 A.2d 940 (Maretz v. 595 Corporate Circle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.