Maresca v. Prudential Insurance of America

255 A.D. 865, 7 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5693
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 14, 1938·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order of the City Court of Yonkers, vacating order requiring security for costs, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Plaintiff’s intestate was not a resident of the city of Yonkers, nor is plaintiff such a resident. The specific provision contained in section 1522, Civil Practice Act, is, therefore, applicable irrespective of section 1523, Civil Practice Act, generally relating to legal representatives in their capacity as such and not to the factor of residence. (Allocio v. Colonial Life Ins. Co., 246 App. Div. 621.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maresca v. Prudential Insurance of America, 255 A.D. 865, 7 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 865 (Maresca v. Prudential Insurance of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duggan v. Syracuse University
20 Misc. 2d 627 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Oliva v. D'Amato
198 Misc. 841 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)
Gilbert v. 503-507 West 177th Street Corp.
186 Misc. 78 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)