Mares, Anthony

Opinion

w /)-(:U/']~C){ 02 ,0;§

HECE|VED !N ‘ l 4 d COURT OF CHlM!NAL APPEALS de,_c£m\>e,(\'/\ |&0\§ _ - » . ' DE@ 18 2015 d A_REL Au:>e.TA _\ 0 m ~~ ’ Ab@'ACosta. C|erk \QQQ_U_BE_C_&:QM_L;»_A_»_B_?.%ALS ` 90 301 \3`303_,§_§,_<)\§> lro\ S~\~¢Acgr\ Aus‘\\`r\ T¢L¥qc 78“7\\ Re ”. l\/\ARE'§/ ANT\-\ON\/ CLA__/>_Lo,.__\_/\! R ~ 61,_&>5\]_:_0_\:,;_0.6_\_5.53` 0 '>\ `Tm\ (_Qu_d_;_%t_,_\\n. &»\sn- A ; -3@,3\ ~Q . '€Deo»r ‘N\§_.__V_\_be,\ ALQ§~¥¢\ l __ \Mar\\’ ‘\O '\'\;m,r\\”~ who 'c\=r( *\~\g;\b \_f\e,\§>=,_“_ cd\(\ .\.Q.§§(,. N\¢~‘\ Br\ \\.‘_D.L_J__.§Cov`\3¢¢3w_ c\>!`_. \:_¢'.\§»_,m ::5;3_\3‘, _'&O\§ _:

( DN\Q. 4\'z) \mu \\wvd Q_\.),.*._.O§._<§.\;¢¢‘§Q.;QF::

`X. c~N\ ¢)J\ _,_;\¢\d.`\§en

\` \G.\, (_Y_.\G,(\,m_\/\’_.,_l\'.\\_'_u__‘ \' ex \{=...._\..:\ !'L\_\._\'._ e~(>\ `5\./~_110;»_~)3£./.¢15.£mo§.__\.€/%_a\_m`\_i\£€$;~_/§m<\ -\- \R»J`b;.€¢¢§.\.m.\it_¢).;_ohp_¢§' .\Q§.....PD§$A&.\&.__\_'_Q~W \/;¥,Caf:` ¥\..N\Q,

1 am u~r;oh\z, X‘o § 53 0_5¢<.55“5§ Su\\'o\¥\e rm\ ex

£er m\|\ %\'\'\jr.\*'\()(\'

____-ml

l w_.Q\>_.Co.r.\v`\ _<.Xe,<\_,o{,__.{§a:)£,vq §<>,3 Qo§>\oer\l T\r\a .6;¥_0\§_¢.__\55-\_\;\.\_\5\3____£0\;\/.0_¢`0.\:»\.@5@¢_\¢`.,3&¢5 ¢55€5@3__5~\:\'.\.(.65_£0>/ r\'

-." c

(`@vera@ gma__r_;e¢w_\‘<>.v_\rlz¢\ ‘oc\<.\¢` Xv -\/\¢\e, \¢\`\Q\ muc)c gsr

C€~SQD§;AQQJ, I\'/e, e_r\c,\_o_bg\ <1 ce‘o\\` op ~\-\'\g, N\F;¢\¢Xcéve_ Q.s_v\)__\§_o¢,___ ~\N@_`(C?P_la>l__m>)'-_'____ 5"~¢¥?0/\ bg '\'\'\Is_c_oor¥s' 4 §§ {\,‘\\l\j_$__`\'l\¢-A'} \£,Z§ ‘\`0 `x'\r\b N\ou\c§,q§€ 1 \\aUL ur\(\€,l`\ (\Q(\

'\-\n@ 4\\¢\¢-~\§ \r\ a\)€$¥ wm '

_\`\r\e, ~\~c~.¢\\ mur\ r\`A r\o'¥ &u‘~u§v -\N\e, mée,\/`. ¢>U\j w\`~\\\ \;\,e/_\~A_§_v:_‘ge_l_m¢.,__`\_'o_r>_5¥1>._\_'0_{,__Qc>_f_\_s_`\,c\.e.l`_

Are \~\r\ere, qr_\_._o,_\/_u_\,;_c¢§__c> c>c ____(`e,\{e:€ o.\_)_c;.h \o.\o\¢ '\~o ¢v\e

Q'\' +\\‘S G\DQM\'*

`\Ouf ‘\~`\rv\_€ rml q“\¥e,¢\~\~\"(\¢\ §§ greq\'_\>/,-_q_i>p_\`_e¢,_\g-\Q(\ 63\(\ \'\\`\€ ` N\o;"~'\'€,(`. k n

3`\ maem\¢..

&V\=@/

¥Q,\:j\_:‘>€)(\ \)f\`\\' \o\\ac>, sw__gé@ Br,

e.

N\';Amj “<~§/ .7§9§';\ `

Anmg_r>c:l_, MA_RE_>.N.&SM/Q,._______

. _VQ TEXAS COURT OF CR|MINAL APPEALS Aus_tin, Texas _ MANDA~TE i; irHE STATE oF TEXAS,

ro ruiz 3121) ms'rRICT CoURT oF ANDERSON CoUNTY _. GREETINGS _ cwa

Before our COURT O>F CRIMINAL APPEALS, on MAY 19, 2910, the cause upon an Application for :*" . -Writ of Habeas Corpus styled: v t _ ` n EX PARTE ANTHONY MARES

_CCRA No. AP'-"7\6,219 _.

Tr Crt. No. _2______4573- B k

was determined; and therein our said COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS made its order in these Words:

"This cause came on to be heard on the Application foi Writ of Habeas Corpus, and the same being considered, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IS

GRANTED, in accordance with the Opinion of this Court, and that this _Decision be certified below for3

9 Obsewance."

WHEREFORE We command you to observe the order of our said COURT OF CRIMINAL

‘#~s‘g°"‘~as;€,

§§ T§§.¢'€

' th' bilga fngnd€ 111_‘3.1,

WITNEss, THE HoNoRABLE sHARoN K`ELLER, Presiding Judge er Our Said COURT or CRIM_INAL APPE-ALS o

E

With the Seal thereof annexed at the City of Austin, on(\his \dz}Y/_ Jun_e 14 2010.

-\K/:zso\i ."1@r1< ' / Chief Deputy Clerk

_, '. The withheld evidence does not exonerate applicant of his participation in the robbery,' but '

had the state_time,ly disclosed Yao’s state`me'rits,l as required by Brady, the statements could have been used by the defense to persuade the jury that applicant was not the shooter. ln light of all the evidence,' including the highly fauoral;le disposition of Whitlock’s charges, the`absence o"f the withheld evidence undermines confidence,in the jury’s determination`of punishment Because criminal trials are bifurcated, yve may- grant r'e-lief’b'y'ord'ering`either a new trial or a new hearing on punishment only. Ex parte Hill", 528`8.\‘.\/";-2d 12»5`,'"1"27 ('Tex. `Ci'i`rri';"*-A`pp?.“`l’§7'5')1‘"'We grant-applicant

l

relief in part and remand the case to the trial court for a new punishment hearing

_Deii"v@red; May 19, 2010 Do not publish