Marder v. Heinemann
This text of 114 A.D. 794 (Marder v. Heinemann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The refusal of the defendant to allow the plaintiff to remove the plate glass to take out his ice box was a conversion thereof. By assenting to the removal of the plate glass to take the ice box in, the defendant assented to the taking of it out in the same way (Kelsey v. Durkee, 33 Barb. 410).
The judgment should be reversed.
Woodward, Jbnks, Hooker and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 A.D. 794, 100 N.Y.S. 250, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marder-v-heinemann-nyappdiv-1906.