Marder v. Heinemann
114 A.D. 794, 100 N.Y.S. 250, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2191
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 24, 1906·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The refusal of the defendant to allow the plaintiff to remove the plate glass to take out his ice box was a conversion thereof. By assenting to the removal of the plate glass to take the ice box in, the defendant assented to the taking of it out in the same way (Kelsey v. Durkee, 33 Barb. 410).
The judgment should be reversed.
Woodward, Jbnks, Hooker and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marder v. Heinemann, 114 A.D. 794, 100 N.Y.S. 250, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
114 A.D. 794 (Marder v. Heinemann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Second On Second Café, Inc. v. Hing Sing Trading, Inc.
66 A.D.2d 255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Henry A. Fabrycky, Inc. v. Nad Realty Corp.
261 A.D. 268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
Scott v. Browning Business Service, Inc.
175 Misc. 630 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1941)