Marcy v. Russ

Connecticut Superior Court

Marcy v. Russ

1 Root 176

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1790

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Root 176 (Marcy v. Russ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marcy v. Russ, 1 Root 176 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

Pincite

Opinion

And

by the Court.

The bond with surety which is to be lodged with the clerk upon taking out execution on a judgment by default, against an absentee, is altogether in favor and for the security of the debtor, provided he returns into the state and seeks redress within a twelve month; but the creditors of such absentee cannot take advantage of it, the execution and levy therefore, are good and valid, as to all other persons besides the debtor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

And

by the Court.

The bond with surety which is to be lodged with the clerk upon taking out execution on a judgment by default, against an absentee, is altogether in favor and for the security of the debtor, provided he returns into the state and seeks redress within a twelve month; but the creditors of such absentee cannot take advantage of it, the execution and levy therefore, are good and valid, as to all other persons besides the debtor.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcy-v-russ-connsuperct-1790.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack