Marcy v. Ross

12 Vt. 484
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided February 15, 1839·Published

Opinion

In this case at the present term, a motion was filed to suppress the testimony of certain witnesses for some informality in taking it. The testimony had been on file more than one term preceding the present.

The court held that the motion was out of time. Motions to suppress testimony for any defect, which is curable, should be made at the earliest opportunity, in order to enable the party, relying upon the testimony, to obviate the objection by obtaining an order to reexamine the witness.

The motion was overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marcy v. Ross, 12 Vt. 484 (Vt. 1839).

12 Vt. 484 (Marcy v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.