Marcus Wayne Dixon v. State
This text of Marcus Wayne Dixon v. State (Marcus Wayne Dixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 22, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-01132-CR
MARCUS WAYNE DIXON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 232nd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1033424
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a guilty plea to possession of less than one gram of cocaine. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on October 25, 2005, to confinement for six months in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. Because appellant has no right to appeal, we dismiss.
The trial court entered a certification of the defendant=s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court=s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The certification is supported by the record. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614‑15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed December 22, 2005.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Anderson.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marcus Wayne Dixon v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-wayne-dixon-v-state-texapp-2005.