Marcus Wayne Barnes v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 3, 2012
Docket07-11-00382-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Marcus Wayne Barnes v. State (Marcus Wayne Barnes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcus Wayne Barnes v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NO. 07-11-00382-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 3, 2012

MARCUS WAYNE BARNES, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 63,158-E; HONORABLE DOUGLAS WOODBURN, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND

The State has filed a motion to abate and remand this case for preparation of

findings of fact and conclusions of law. Following the denial of his motion to suppress,

appellant Marcus Wayne Barnes filed a written request for findings of fact and

conclusions of law, which requested was granted by written order of the trial court. The

requested findings and conclusions were not filed, however.

Accordingly, the appeal is abated and the case remanded to the trial court. The

trial court is directed to state its essential findings of fact and conclusions of law

adequate to provide this court with a basis on which to review the trial court’s application of the law to the facts. State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex.Crim.App.

2006). The trial judge may review the reporter’s record to refresh his recollection of the

reasons for his rulings. Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987).

The trial court shall cause the preparation of a supplemental clerk’s record containing its

findings and conclusions, together with any orders the court signs during remand, and

shall cause the supplemental clerk’s record, together with a supplemental reporter’s

record of any hearing held, to be filed with this court by February 24, 2012. The trial

court may seek an extension of that deadline from this court if necessary.

The appeal will be reinstated upon the filing of the supplemental record directed

by this order. Based on his review of the trial court’s findings and conclusions, appellant

may file an amended or supplemental brief within thirty days of the date the case is

reinstated. Tex. R. App. P. 38.7. Within ten days of the date the case is reinstated,

appellant shall notify this Court and the State in writing whether he elects to file an

amended or supplemental brief.

If appellant elects not to file an amended or supplemental brief, the State’s brief

shall be due thirty days from the date of appellant’s written notice. If appellant files an

amended or supplemental brief, the State’s brief shall be due thirty days from the date

of its filing.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cullen
195 S.W.3d 696 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Wicker v. State
740 S.W.2d 779 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marcus Wayne Barnes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-wayne-barnes-v-state-texapp-2012.