Marcus v. State
This text of 561 So. 2d 1367 (Marcus v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm Marcus’ convictions but remand for a correction of the sentence for possession of drug paraphernalia.
The state concedes that a scrivener’s error appears in Marcus’ sentence on the charge of possession of drug paraphernalia, in that the space indicating credit for time served as to that count was inadvertently left blank. Therefore, we remand the case solely for the trial court to make that correction of the sentence. The presence of defendant is not necessary.
The convictions are affirmed with directions to correct a scrivener’s error in the sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
561 So. 2d 1367, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4329, 1990 WL 80797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.