Marcus v. Pomeranz
90 N.Y.S. 139, 98 A.D. 619
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 11, 1904
StatusPublished
This text of 90 N.Y.S. 139 (Marcus v. Pomeranz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marcus v. Pomeranz, 90 N.Y.S. 139, 98 A.D. 619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).
Opinion
The order should be modified by requiring defendant to pay, as a further condition of opening the default and vacating the judgment, ail costs of the action to the date of granting the order, including a trial fee, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
90 N.Y.S. 139, 98 A.D. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-v-pomeranz-nyappdiv-1904.