Marcus v. Marcus

45 A.D.3d 689, 844 N.Y.S.2d 886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[690] In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J.), dated February 16, 2007, which denied his objections to so much of an order of the same court (Orlando, S.M.), dated September 27, 2006, as, after a hearing, denied his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation, the father failed to meet his burden of demonstrating a substantial change in circumstance warranting such a modification (see Matter of Talty v Talty, 42 AD3d 546 [2007]). While the father presented evidence of a modest salary decrease, he was nonetheless possessed of sufficient means to provide support at the level ordered (id,.). Accordingly, the father’s petition was properly denied. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marcus v. Marcus, 45 A.D.3d 689, 844 N.Y.S.2d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

45 A.D.3d 689 (Marcus v. Marcus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Solis v. Marmolejos
50 A.D.3d 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)