Marcus v. Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marcus v. Marcus

111 A.D.2d 749, 489 N.Y.S.2d 864, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49990

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.2d 749 (Marcus v. Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marcus v. Marcus, 111 A.D.2d 749, 489 N.Y.S.2d 864, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49990 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated divorce actions, the husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buschmann, J.), dated September 24,1983, as (1) awarded the wife custody of the parties’ child, (2) directed him to pay child support in the sum of $65 per week, (3) granted him allegedly inadequate visitation, and (4) failed to direct that the wife provide him with maintenance.

Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term’s conclusion that the child’s best interests would be better served by giving the mother custody has support in the [750]*750record. The awards of child support and visitation and the denial of maintenance were likewise supported by the evidence. Our determination is not intended to preclude Special Term’s review of the issue of visitation, which matter is now pending. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated divorce actions, the husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buschmann, J.), dated September 24,1983, as (1) awarded the wife custody of the parties’ child, (2) directed him to pay child support in the sum of $65 per week, (3) granted him allegedly inadequate visitation, and (4) failed to direct that the wife provide him with maintenance.

Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term’s conclusion that the child’s best interests would be better served by giving the mother custody has support in the [750]*750record. The awards of child support and visitation and the denial of maintenance were likewise supported by the evidence. Our determination is not intended to preclude Special Term’s review of the issue of visitation, which matter is now pending. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 749, 489 N.Y.S.2d 864, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-v-marcus-nyappdiv-1985.