Marcus v. LONDON & LANCASHIRE INDEM. CO. OF AM.

157 N.E.2d 714, 5 N.Y.2d 961
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 26, 1959
StatusPublished

This text of 157 N.E.2d 714 (Marcus v. LONDON & LANCASHIRE INDEM. CO. OF AM.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcus v. LONDON & LANCASHIRE INDEM. CO. OF AM., 157 N.E.2d 714, 5 N.Y.2d 961 (N.Y. 1959).

Opinion

5 N.Y.2d 961 (1959)

Arlene Marcus, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Samuel B. Marcus, Respondent,
v.
London & Lancashire Indemnity Company of America, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 12, 1959.
Decided February 26, 1959.

James D. Maher and Warren W. Wells for appellant.

Harold Weiss for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.

Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marcus v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America
5 N.Y.2d 961 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 N.E.2d 714, 5 N.Y.2d 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-v-london-lancashire-indem-co-of-am-ny-1959.