Marcus v. Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael), Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marcus v. Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael), Inc.

183 A.D.2d 505, 586 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 183 A.D.2d 505 (Marcus v. Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael), Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marcus v. Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael), Inc., 183 A.D.2d 505, 586 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered July 1, 1991, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to hold [506]*506defendant in contempt and awarded defendant costs for frivolous conduct in the form of $2,000 attorneys’ fees, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of vacating the award of costs, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Order of same court, entered June 26, 1991, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ motion for class action certification, partial summary judgment as to liability only on their third cause of action, and dismissal of the fourth, eighth and ninth affirmative defenses, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We modify only to the extent of striking the court’s sua sponte imposition of sanctions. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered July 1, 1991, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to hold [506]*506defendant in contempt and awarded defendant costs for frivolous conduct in the form of $2,000 attorneys’ fees, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of vacating the award of costs, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Order of same court, entered June 26, 1991, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ motion for class action certification, partial summary judgment as to liability only on their third cause of action, and dismissal of the fourth, eighth and ninth affirmative defenses, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We modify only to the extent of striking the court’s sua sponte imposition of sanctions. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 A.D.2d 505, 586 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-v-jewish-national-fund-keren-kayemeth-leisrael-inc-nyappdiv-1992.