Marcus Upshaw v. State
This text of 245 So. 3d 1020 (Marcus Upshaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
MARCUS A. UPSHAW,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-3717
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 22, 2018
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Lawrence J. Semento, Judge.
Marcus A. Upshaw, Jasper, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Marcus Upshaw appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal
sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The State
properly concedes that one of the issues raised by Upshaw has merit.
In June 2015, Upshaw entered a nolo contendere plea on Count I in case number
2014-CF-002517 to felony petit theft, a third-degree felony. Upshaw was sentenced to six years in prison on that count, the lowest permissible sentence as reflected on his
scoresheet. However, as the State acknowledges, the scoresheet was erroneous
because it improperly used Upshaw’s 2010 aggravated assault with a deadly weapon
conviction as the primary offense, rather than as a prior offense. Because a properly
calculated scoresheet would yield a lowest permissible sentence on this charge of less
than five years, the trial court was precluded from imposing a sentence greater than the
five-year statutory maximum. Accordingly, on remand, the trial court is directed to vacate
the sentence imposed on Upshaw’s felony petit theft conviction in case number 2014-CF-
002517 and to resentence him. We find the other issues raised by Upshaw to be without
merit.
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J. and ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 So. 3d 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-upshaw-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.