Marcus Neal Meadows v. the State of Texas

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00229-CR __________________

MARCUS NEAL MEADOWS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19-08-10586-CR __________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief

concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the

motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of appellant’s right to examine the

appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form

motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313,

319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

1 On January 5, 2022, appellant requested access to the appellate record with

this Court. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper

copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written

verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was

provided, on or before January 31, 2022. See Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 321–22.

ORDER ENTERED January 10, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.