Marcus Lee Jefferson v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-12-01076-CR Style: Marcus Lee Jefferson v The State of Texas * Date motion filed : December 13, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to Provide Legal Counsel Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:
If motion to extend time: Deadline to file document: Number of previous extensions granted: Length of extension sought:
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due:
The Clerk is instructed to file the document as of the date of this order Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time
X Denied
Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
On September 3, 2013, Appellant’s counsel filed an Anders brief. On December 13, 2013, Appellant filed a motion requesting that this Court “grant a motion to provide legal counsel to file a response to previous counsel’s Anders brief.” Although Appellant has the right to file a pro se response to an Anders brief, Appellant is not entitled to have counsel appointed to file such a response. Accordingly, the motion is denied.
Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland Acting individually Acting for the Court
Panel consists of ______________________________.
Date: January 7, 2014
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marcus Lee Jefferson v. State (Marcus Lee Jefferson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.