Marcus Johnson, A/K/A Mack P. Carter v. Sussex County Jail E. Stewart Kitchen, Sheriff M. Knowles, Lieutenant John Zimmerman, Sergeant

52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17568, 1995 WL 215434
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 12, 1995
Docket95-6127
StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.3d 321 (Marcus Johnson, A/K/A Mack P. Carter v. Sussex County Jail E. Stewart Kitchen, Sheriff M. Knowles, Lieutenant John Zimmerman, Sergeant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcus Johnson, A/K/A Mack P. Carter v. Sussex County Jail E. Stewart Kitchen, Sheriff M. Knowles, Lieutenant John Zimmerman, Sergeant, 52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17568, 1995 WL 215434 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

52 F.3d 321
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Marcus JOHNSON, a/k/a Mack P. Carter, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
SUSSEX COUNTY JAIL; E. Stewart Kitchen, Sheriff; M.
Knowles, Lieutenant; John Zimmerman, Sergeant,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6127.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: April 12, 1995.

Marcus Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Archer Lafayette Yeatts, III, Maloney, Yeatts & Barr, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Sussex County Jail, No. CA-94-50 (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17568, 1995 WL 215434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-johnson-aka-mack-p-carter-v-sussex-county-j-ca4-1995.