Marcus Everette Harper v. Texas Tech Health Science Center
This text of Marcus Everette Harper v. Texas Tech Health Science Center (Marcus Everette Harper v. Texas Tech Health Science Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Texas Tech Health Science
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 27, 2015
No. 04-15-00489-CV
Marcus Everette HARPER, Appellant
v.
TEXAS TECH HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER, Appellee
From the 251st District Court, Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 97,305-C Ana Estevez, Judge Presiding
ORDER This appeal was transferred to this court from the Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo. The order appellant seeks to appeal is an order granting the motion to dismiss filed by Texas Tech Health Science Center pursuant to section 74.351(b) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code (“Code”). Although a party may appeal from an order denying a motion filed pursuant to section 74.351(b), see TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE. § 51.014(a)(9), section 51.014(a) does not authorize an appeal from an interlocutory order granting a motion filed pursuant to section 74.351(b). Because the order appellant seeks to appeal does not dispose of all parties and causes of action and the trial court did not enter a severance order, the order is interlocutory and is not final and appealable. See Houston Health Clubs, Inc. v. First Court of Appeals, 722 S.W.2d 692, 693 (Tex. 1986); Northeast Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966).
Before this appeal was transferred, the Seventh Court of Appeals issued a letter questioning its jurisdiction over the appeal and requesting responses from the parties. In his response, appellant states the trial court authorized the appeal under section 51.014(d) of the Code; however, the citation to the record set forth in appellant’s response does not support this statement. Furthermore, this court could not locate an order signed by the trial court authorizing appellant’s appeal pursuant to section 51.014(d). It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of August, 2015.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marcus Everette Harper v. Texas Tech Health Science Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-everette-harper-v-texas-tech-health-science-texapp-2015.