Marcus Dairy, Inc. v. Jacene Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marcus Dairy, Inc. v. Jacene Realty Corp.

27 A.D.3d 427, 810 N.Y.S.2d 661

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 27 A.D.3d 427 (Marcus Dairy, Inc. v. Jacene Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marcus Dairy, Inc. v. Jacene Realty Corp., 27 A.D.3d 427, 810 N.Y.S.2d 661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Columbia Equities, Ltd., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered September 21, 2004, which, upon an order of the same court (Murphy, J.) dated March 25, 2004, granting that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for summary judgment, awarded foreclosure and sale of the subject property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to the doctrine of law of the case, judicial determinations made during the course of a litigation before final judgment is entered may have preclusive effect provided that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the initial determination (see Purpura v Purpura, 21 AD3d 542 [2005]; Stone v Stone, 19 AD3d 404 [2005]; Engel v Eichler, 300 AD2d 622, 623 [2002]). The issues raised by the appellant on this appeal are the same as those raised by it and addressed by this Court on a prior appeal (see Marcus Dairy v Jacene Realty Corp., 298 AD2d 366 [2002]). Since the appellant had a full and fair opportunity to litigate these issues, it is precluded from relitigating them. Miller, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Columbia Equities, Ltd., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered September 21, 2004, which, upon an order of the same court (Murphy, J.) dated March 25, 2004, granting that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for summary judgment, awarded foreclosure and sale of the subject property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to the doctrine of law of the case, judicial determinations made during the course of a litigation before final judgment is entered may have preclusive effect provided that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the initial determination (see Purpura v Purpura, 21 AD3d 542 [2005]; Stone v Stone, 19 AD3d 404 [2005]; Engel v Eichler, 300 AD2d 622, 623 [2002]). The issues raised by the appellant on this appeal are the same as those raised by it and addressed by this Court on a prior appeal (see Marcus Dairy v Jacene Realty Corp., 298 AD2d 366 [2002]). Since the appellant had a full and fair opportunity to litigate these issues, it is precluded from relitigating them. Miller, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.3d 427, 810 N.Y.S.2d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-dairy-inc-v-jacene-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack