Marcus D. Hanyard v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

121 N.E.3d 153
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 31, 2019
DocketCourt of Appeals Case 18A-CR-1237
StatusPublished

This text of 121 N.E.3d 153 (Marcus D. Hanyard v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcus D. Hanyard v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.), 121 N.E.3d 153 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Mathias, Judge.

[1] Marcus Hanyard ("Hanyard") was convicted in Delaware Circuit Court of murder, Level 1 felony conspiracy to commit burglary, and Level 4 felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon. He was ordered to serve an aggregate sixty-one-year term in the Department of Correction. On appeal, Hanyard argues that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to prove that he committed the charged offenses.

[2] We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[3] On February 9, 2017, between 3:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m., Hunter Hess ("Hess"), Isaiah Davis ("Davis"), and Zack Farmer ("Farmer"), were smoking marijuana at Davis's home in Muncie, Indiana. The three men were in Davis's bedroom, which was situated at the front of the house, when Hess heard a gunshot coming from the doorway of the bedroom. Hess looked up and saw a black man with a handgun in the doorway of the bedroom, but he could not see the man's face clearly. Davis also saw the man in the doorway but did not get a good look at the man's face.

[4] Davis grabbed his gun, which was laying on a table nearby, and shot at the man in the doorway. The man with the gun fled Davis's home. Hess and Davis then discovered that Farmer had been shot in the head, chest and legs. Davis told Hess not to call the police because there were drugs in the house. As Davis began to hide the money and drugs in the house, Hess carried Farmer out to his vehicle so that he could take him to the hospital. A neighbor who heard the gunshots called 911, and law enforcement officers arrived before Hess could leave to go to the hospital. Shortly thereafter, Farmer was pronounced dead at the scene.

[5] Davis was a known drug dealer in the Muncie area. Davis and Matt Fisher ("Fisher") purchased drugs from each other. On some date prior to February 9, 2017, Fisher, Hanyard, and three other individuals discussed robbing Davis. Fisher stated that he would find out whether Davis had drugs in his possession on the date of the planned robbery. Tr. Vol. III, p. 66. Fisher also agreed to give Hanyard information about where the drugs would be located inside Davis's home and how many people were in the home. Id. at 69. Fisher knew that Davis kept his drugs and money in one of the front rooms of the house and that Davis had a safe.

[6] Davis and Fisher exchanged text messages on February 8, 2017 at approximately 9:40 p.m. because Davis wanted to buy pain killers from Fisher. Fisher confirmed that Davis had a significant amount of marijuana and Xanax. Fisher then told Hanyard that Davis had drugs at his house. Hanyard responded by saying, "we should hit the lick," meaning that they should rob Davis. Id. at 76.

[7] The next day, Fisher learned that Farmer had been killed at Davis's home. Approximately one week later, Hanyard told Fisher that he had been involved in a shootout at Davis's home. Id. at 79. Hanyard's leg was grazed by a bullet during the shooting causing a wound that was seen by several individuals, including law enforcement officials, within days of the murder. Hanyard told a friend that he was wounded in a robbery that went wrong. Ex. Vol., State's Ex. 284. And Hanyard's cell phone records established that he was near Davis's home within minutes of the shooting on February 9, 2017.

[8] Hanyard was arrested on February 19, 2017, at a friend's home in Indianapolis. The arresting officers noted the wound on his leg, and he was transported to Ball Memorial Hospital. The emergency room doctor concluded that the wound was a graze wound from a gunshot. The officers who searched the home in Indianapolis found a handgun between the mattress and box springs of the bed Hanyard used while he was staying in the home.

[9] The State charged Hanyard with murder, Level 1 felony conspiracy to commit burglary, Level 2 felony attempted robbery, and Level 4 felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon. A jury trial commenced on February 27, 2018. Hanyard was found guilty of murder, Level 1 felony burglary, and Level 2 felony attempted armed robbery. In a bifurcated proceeding, Hanyard was also found guilty of Level 4 felony possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon. Prior to sentencing, the trial court merged the robbery count with the murder count. Hanyard was then ordered to serve an aggregate sixty-one-year term executed in the Department of Correction. Hanyard now appeals.

Standard of Review

[10] Hanyard argues that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to prove that he committed murder, Level 1 felony conspiracy to commit burglary, and Level 4 felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon. When we review a challenge to the sufficiency of evidence, "we do not reweigh the evidence or judge the credibility of the witnesses, and we respect a fact-finder's exclusive province to weigh conflicting evidence." Phipps v. State , 90 N.E.3d 1190 , 1195 (Ind. 2018) (quotation marks omitted). We consider only the probative evidence and the reasonable inferences that support the verdict. Id. We will affirm if the probative evidence and reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence could have allowed a reasonable trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Id.

Discussion and Decision

[11] The State lacked direct evidence that Hanyard committed the challenged offenses. Neither Davis nor Hess got a good look at the face of the man who shot Farmer. But "[a] conviction may be based on circumstantial evidence alone so long as there are reasonable inferences enabling the factfinder to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." Lawrence v. State , 959 N.E.2d 385 , 388 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (citation omitted), trans. denied .

[12] The State presented evidence that on multiple occasions prior to February 9, 2017, Hanyard, Fisher, and three other individuals discussed robbing Davis. Fisher knew that Hanyard carried a semi-automatic, .40 caliber pistol. Fisher told Hanyard where Davis would likely keep his "stash" and described the layout of Davis's house. Tr. Vol. III., pp. 69-70. On the date of the planned robbery, Fisher told Hanyard that he would find out whether Davis had drugs in his possession. Hanyard frequently pressured Fisher for information about whether Davis had money and drugs at his home. Id. at 70.

[13] Approximately one week before Farmer was murdered, Fisher gave Hanyard Davis's address. Hanyard's cell phone contained screenshots of a map locating Davis's address. The screenshots were downloaded three days before the murder.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawrence v. State
959 N.E.2d 385 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2012)
Shelly M. Phipps v. State of Indiana
90 N.E.3d 1190 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 N.E.3d 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-d-hanyard-v-state-of-indiana-mem-dec-indctapp-2019.