Marcus Blalock v. James Polk
This text of Marcus Blalock v. James Polk (Marcus Blalock v. James Polk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-26-00068-CV
Marcus Blalock, Appellant
v.
James Polk, Appellee
On appeal from the County Court at Law of Navarro County, Texas Senior Judge H. D. Black Jr., presiding Trial Court Cause No. C24-32228-CV
JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Marcus Blalock, appealed from a judgment signed by the trial
court on September 26, 2025. Blalock filed a motion to reconsider in the trial
court on October 21, 2025, which was overruled by operation of law. Blalock
filed a notice of appeal in the trial court on February 20, 2026. Blalock was
notified by letter from the Clerk of this Court that the notice of appeal appears
to be untimely and that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction if Blalock did not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Blalock has filed a
response showing that he was attempting to get a hearing from the trial court
but a hearing was never set until he found out that the motion had been
overruled by operation of law.
A notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the judgment is
signed when a motion to modify the judgment is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P.
26.1(a). The deadline for filing a notice of appeal may be extended if a motion
is filed to extend the deadline within 15 days of the deadline to file a notice of
appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Beyond that time, the notice of appeal is
untimely, and this Court is without jurisdiction to consider it.
In this appeal, the notice of appeal was due on December 29, 2025, due
to holidays and weekends. The notice of appeal was filed almost two months
later, and was therefore, untimely. Accordingly, this Court does not have
jurisdiction and this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
LEE HARRIS Justice
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: March 19, 2026 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Appeal dismissed CV06
Blalock v. Polk Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marcus Blalock v. James Polk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-blalock-v-james-polk-txctapp10-2026.