Marcus Anthony Esparza v. State
This text of Marcus Anthony Esparza v. State (Marcus Anthony Esparza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 12-15-00094-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 6/22/2015 10:39:12 AM CATHY LUSK CLERK
No. 12-15-00094-CR
MARCUS ANTHONY ESPARZA § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN Appellant § 12th COURT OF APPEALS § TYLER, TEXAS vs. § 12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 6/22/2015 10:39:12 AM § CATHY S. LUSK THE STATE OF TEXAS, § Clerk Appellee § AT TYLER, TEXAS
MOTION TO WITHDRAW
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
Now comes Austin Reeve Jackson, counsel for Appellant in the above entitled and
numbered cause, and makes this Motion to Withdraw, and for good cause shows the following:
I.
Counsel was appointed to represent Appellant in the appeal of this matter. Having
undertaken a diligent and thorough review of the record, counsel has concluded that, in his
professional judgment, there exist no arguable grounds for reversible error. A copy of
Appellant’s Brief filed pursuant to the requirements of Anders v. California, along with a copy of
this Motion, has been served on Appellant who has also been informed of the right to file a pro
se brief by 22 July 2015, the right object to this Motion, and the right to obtain a copy of records
from counsel. Said notification was sent to Appellant by first class certified mail at:
Inmate 00624827 Byrd Unit 21 FM 247 Huntsville, TX 77320
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, undersigned counsel respectfully prays
that, in accordance with the applicable law, the Court grant this Motion to Withdraw and afford
Appellant an opportunity to file a pro se brief in this matter. Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Austin Reeve Jackson Texas Bar No. 24046139 112 East Line, Suite 310 Tyler, TX 75702 Telephone: (903) 595-6070 Facsimile: (866) 387-0152
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was
served on counsel for the State by efile. Further, a copy of this Motion was also served on
Appellant by certified first class mail.
/s/ Austin Reeve Jackson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marcus Anthony Esparza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcus-anthony-esparza-v-state-texapp-2015.