Marcum v. Marcum

Missouri Court of Appeals

Marcum v. Marcum

230 S.W.3d 641, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1117, 2007 WL 2301352

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 14, 2007

DocketWD 66734

StatusPublished

This text of 230 S.W.3d 641 (Marcum v. Marcum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marcum v. Marcum, 230 S.W.3d 641, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1117, 2007 WL 2301352 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

*642 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Marcum appeals from the judgment denying his Motion to Modify Child Support. He contends the motion court erred in calculating the Form 14, upon which it determined that there was not a 20% decrease in the presumed child support amount to warrant modification. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*642 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Marcum appeals from the judgment denying his Motion to Modify Child Support. He contends the motion court erred in calculating the Form 14, upon which it determined that there was not a 20% decrease in the presumed child support amount to warrant modification. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 S.W.3d 641, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1117, 2007 WL 2301352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcum-v-marcum-moctapp-2007.