Marcum v. Marcum
Opinion
*642 ORDER
Daniel Marcum appeals from the judgment denying his Motion to Modify Child Support. He contends the motion court erred in calculating the Form 14, upon which it determined that there was not a 20% decrease in the presumed child support amount to warrant modification. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
230 S.W.3d 641 (Marcum v. Marcum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.