Marcum v. Burgess

67 Ala. 556
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 67 Ala. 556 (Marcum v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcum v. Burgess, 67 Ala. 556 (Ala. 1880).

Opinion

STONE, J.

— The statutory damages of twenty per cent, on the judgment for not returning an execution according to the mandate thereof, can be recovered of a sheriff only in a summary proceeding under the statute. — Code of 1876, section 3357; Governor v. Powell, 10 Ala. 544. In a common law action on the bond for not returning such process, the statutory damages, as such, can not be recovered. The violation of duty by the sheriff, in not returning the execution, is a breach of the official bond, which entitles the plaintiff to recover ; but in the absence of averment and proof of actual injury, there can be only nominal damages. — Bagley v. Harris, 9 Ala. 173; Evans v. Governor, 18 Ala. 659. The Circuit Court, however, erred in sustaining the demurrer to the complaint. It is sufficient for the recovery of nominal damages.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Higdon v. Fields
60 So. 594 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Branch v. Davis
29 F. 888 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Ala. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcum-v-burgess-ala-1880.