Marcott v. Alpha Enterprises, Inc.

37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34869, 1994 WL 577424
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 20, 1994
Docket94-1351
StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1494 (Marcott v. Alpha Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcott v. Alpha Enterprises, Inc., 37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34869, 1994 WL 577424 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Joan A. MARCOTT, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
ALPHA ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; Arthur L. Nicholson;
Dorothea Nicholson; Harold Goff; Farmers & Merchants Bank;
M. Lee Boppe, Executive Vice President, Farmers and
Merchants Bank, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-1351.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 21, 1994
Decided Oct. 20, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James H. Michael, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-86-H)

Joan E. Marcott, Appellant Pro Se.

Douglas Tod Stark, Harrisonburg, Va; Dale Alan Davenport, Hoover, Penrod, Davenport & Crist, Harrisonburg, VA; Michael Leo Bryan, Winchester, VA, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on her civil complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marcott v. Alpha Enterprises, No. CA 93-86-H (W.D.Va. Feb. 17, 1994; Mar. 4, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34869, 1994 WL 577424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcott-v-alpha-enterprises-inc-ca4-1994.