Marcos Perez Jimenez v. Guy W. Hixon, United States Marshal and Manuel Aristeguieta

314 F.2d 654
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 13, 1963
Docket20242
StatusPublished

This text of 314 F.2d 654 (Marcos Perez Jimenez v. Guy W. Hixon, United States Marshal and Manuel Aristeguieta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcos Perez Jimenez v. Guy W. Hixon, United States Marshal and Manuel Aristeguieta, 314 F.2d 654 (5th Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the order of Chief Judge Tuttle of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, of December 22, 1962, dismissing appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and request for enlargement on bail pending appeal. Since habeas corpus is not a proper remedy for relief from an appealable order revoking appellant’s bail entered by the District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on December 12,1962, habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy.

The order appealed from is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
314 F.2d 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcos-perez-jimenez-v-guy-w-hixon-united-states-marshal-and-manuel-ca5-1963.