Marcos Gonzalez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 12, 2009
Docket14-08-00958-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Marcos Gonzalez v. State (Marcos Gonzalez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcos Gonzalez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 12, 2009

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 12, 2009.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00958-CR

MARCOS GONZALEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 48205

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of misdemeanor assault. On September 17, 2008, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 365 days in the Fort Bend County Jail and assessed a fine of $2,000.  Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. 


Appellant did not retain counsel to prosecute this appeal.  Appellant also did not pay for preparation of the reporter=s record.  No brief has been filed.  On February 5, 2009, this court ordered a hearing to determine whether appellant wished to continue his appeal.  On March 2, 2009, the trial court conducted the hearing.  The record of the hearing was filed in this court on March 5, 2009.  Based upon the trial court hearing record, we may consider the appeal without a brief as justice may require.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). 

At the hearing, appellant testified that he has completed serving his sentence and he no longer desires to appeal.  To expedite a decision in this case, we suspend the requirement in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) for a written motion to dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 2.

Accordingly, we grant appellant=s request and order the appeal dismissed.  We direct the Clerk of the Court to issue the mandate of the Court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore.

Do not publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marcos Gonzalez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcos-gonzalez-v-state-texapp-2009.