Marcos Bonia v. State

197 So. 3d 1280, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12888, 2016 WL 4524754
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 26, 2016·No. 5D15-2492·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the order summarily denying his motion for return of property. The State properly concedes error in that the trial court did not address the applicability of section 705.105, Florida Statutes. See Davis v. State, 63 So.3d 888, 889 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (holding that lower court must attach records to establish property was seized as evidence to support summary denial of motion for return of property pursuant to section 705.105); Stevenson v. State, 688 So.2d 962 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (reversing denial of motion for return . of property pursuant to section 705.105 where- record did. not establish statute applied).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LAWSON, C.J., ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marcos Bonia v. State, 197 So. 3d 1280, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12888, 2016 WL 4524754 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

197 So. 3d 1280 (Marcos Bonia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. State
273 So. 3d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)