Marco v. Sachs

270 A.D. 948, 62 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4822
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 1946·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

-Order denying appellants’ motion to make the amended complaint more definite and certain, without prejudice to an application for a bill of particulars, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, the further amended complaint to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Appellants are entitled to have the complaint made more definite by showing the dates upon which the numerous acts alleged to have been committed, pursuant to the alleged conspiracy, took place, so as to enable them to determine whether or hot they have a defense under the Statute of Limitations. (Boyle v. McLaughlin, 195 App. Div. 413; Peters v. Huppert, 159 App. Div. 829; Pigone v. Lauria, 115 App. Div. 286; Bennett v. Lawrence, 71 App. Div. 413.) Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marco v. Sachs, 270 A.D. 948, 62 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

270 A.D. 948 (Marco v. Sachs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lait v. Leon
37 Misc. 2d 800 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Greenberg v. Nusbaum's Department Store, Inc.
35 Misc. 2d 326 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Symons Galleries, Inc. v. Phillips
15 A.D.2d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Pearlson v. Javitz
10 A.D.2d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Manacher v. Central Coal Co.
2 A.D.2d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)