MARCO PACE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 21, 2023.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D23-0017
Lower Tribunal Nos. F98-36722, & F99-4398
Marco Pace,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Robert T. Watson, Judge.
Marco Pace, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before HENDON, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 290 (Fla. 2003)
(“Although res judicata may not apply to motions filed under rule 3.800, the similar, but more narrow, doctrine of collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, does apply.”); Ali v. State, 911 So. 2d 164, 166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“[T]he trial court correctly denied the defendant’s claim regarding lack of notice as this claim may not be raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 . . . .”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MARCO PACE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (MARCO PACE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.