Marco M. Scott v. Ramona Nichols
Opinion
Opinion issued July 12, 2012.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00213-CV ——————————— MARCO M. SCOTT, Appellant V. RAMONA NICHOLS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 257th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-56734
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Marco M. Scott, has neither established indigence nor paid all the
required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases
unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon
2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order
Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of
Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1)
(listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified on March 7, 2012 that this
appeal was subject to dismissal if the fees were not paid within 10 days, appellant
did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule);
42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees.
We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Higley, Sharp, and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marco M. Scott v. Ramona Nichols (Marco M. Scott v. Ramona Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.