Marco M. Scott v. Ramona Nichols

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 12, 2012·No. 01-12-00213-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued July 12, 2012.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00213-CV ——————————— MARCO M. SCOTT, Appellant V. RAMONA NICHOLS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 257th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-56734

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Marco M. Scott, has neither established indigence nor paid all the

required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases

unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon

2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order

Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of

Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1)

(listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified on March 7, 2012 that this

appeal was subject to dismissal if the fees were not paid within 10 days, appellant

did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule);

42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees.

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Sharp, and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marco M. Scott v. Ramona Nichols, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Marco M. Scott v. Ramona Nichols (Marco M. Scott v. Ramona Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.