MARCIANO DORT v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of MARCIANO DORT v. STATE OF FLORIDA (MARCIANO DORT v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
MARCIANO DORT, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-3500
[May 21, 2020]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312010CF000646A.
Marciano Dort, Indiantown, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
DAMOORGIAN, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MARCIANO DORT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marciano-dort-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.