Marchessault v. State
This text of 659 So. 2d 1315 (Marchessault v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael MARCHESSAULT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*1316 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Edward L. Giles, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm that part of the order of revocation finding that Michael Marchessault violated Condition J.9 of community control by failing to remain confined to his approved residence. We reverse appellant's newly-imposed sentence and remand for correction of the order to reflect the appropriate amount of credit for time served on community control from August 25, 1993, the date of imposition of community control, through June 3, 1994, the date of entry of the valid order of revocation. § 948.06(2), Fla. Stat. (1993); see State v. Summers, 642 So.2d 742, 744 (Fla. 1994); accord Roundtree v. State, 637 So.2d 325 (Fla. 4th DCA), approved, 644 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 1994); Gordon v. State, 649 So.2d 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.
DELL, STONE, and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
659 So. 2d 1315, 1995 WL 521099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marchessault-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.