Marches v. Board of Selectman of Town of Lyme

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Marches v. Board of Selectman of Town of Lyme

31 A.3d 1178, 303 Conn. 903, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 489

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedNovember 17, 2011

DocketSC 18890

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.3d 1178 (Marches v. Board of Selectman of Town of Lyme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marches v. Board of Selectman of Town of Lyme, 31 A.3d 1178, 303 Conn. 903, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 489 (Colo. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the defendants board of selectmen of the town of Lyme and the town of Lyme for certifica *904 tion for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn. App. 24 (AC 29999), is granted, limited to the following issue:

Decided November 17, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18890. Kenneth M. McKeever, town attorney, in support of the petition. Harry B. Heller, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court correctly determined that the parties were entitled to a trial de novo in the Superior Court from an appeal taken from the board of selectmen of the town of Lyme pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-40?”

ROGERS, C. J., and HARPER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the defendants board of selectmen of the town of Lyme and the town of Lyme for certifica *904 tion for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn. App. 24 (AC 29999), is granted, limited to the following issue:

Decided November 17, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18890. Kenneth M. McKeever, town attorney, in support of the petition. Harry B. Heller, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court correctly determined that the parties were entitled to a trial de novo in the Superior Court from an appeal taken from the board of selectmen of the town of Lyme pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-40?”

ROGERS, C. J., and HARPER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.3d 1178, 303 Conn. 903, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marches-v-board-of-selectman-of-town-of-lyme-conn-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack