Marchbanks v. Blanton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Marchbanks v. Blanton

228 S.E.2d 287, 139 Ga. App. 368, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1811

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 16, 1976

Docket52468

StatusPublished

This text of 228 S.E.2d 287 (Marchbanks v. Blanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marchbanks v. Blanton, 228 S.E.2d 287, 139 Ga. App. 368, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1811 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Marshall, Judge.

The single issue in this case involves the denial by the trial court of Marchbanks’ motion to dismiss Blanton’s appeal on the alleged ground that the appeal had not been timely filed. The basic suit for damages between these parties was recently before this court in Blanton v. Marchbanks, 139 Ga. App. 158. The issues presented in that appeal included the present question. The issue, sub judice, was decided adversely to Marchbanks in Division 1 of the earlier opinion of this court. The holding therein is controlling and dispositive of this particular facet of this case. There being nothing additional for this court to decide, we adhere to our ruling in Division 1 of case number 52155, affirming the denial of Marchbanks’ motion to dismiss Blanton’s appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell, P. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, Judge.

The single issue in this case involves the denial by the trial court of Marchbanks’ motion to dismiss Blanton’s appeal on the alleged ground that the appeal had not been timely filed. The basic suit for damages between these parties was recently before this court in Blanton v. Marchbanks, 139 Ga. App. 158. The issues presented in that appeal included the present question. The issue, sub judice, was decided adversely to Marchbanks in Division 1 of the earlier opinion of this court. The holding therein is controlling and dispositive of this particular facet of this case. There being nothing additional for this court to decide, we adhere to our ruling in Division 1 of case number 52155, affirming the denial of Marchbanks’ motion to dismiss Blanton’s appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell, P. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 S.E.2d 287, 139 Ga. App. 368, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marchbanks-v-blanton-gactapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack