Marchant, Trustee v. the Valley Falls Baptist Church

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Marchant, Trustee v. the Valley Falls Baptist Church

6 R.I. 24

DecidedMarch 6, 1859

StatusPublished

This text of 6 R.I. 24 (Marchant, Trustee v. the Valley Falls Baptist Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marchant, Trustee v. the Valley Falls Baptist Church, 6 R.I. 24 (R.I. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

Ames, C. J.

This plea is defective, because, instead of expressly or silently confessing the plaintiff’s causes of action which it seeks to avoid, by the introduction of the words “ supposed causes of action in said counts mentioned, if any such there be or still are," it confesses them only hypothetically; which, in pleading, is tantamount to an'argumentative denial of them. Gould v. Lasbury, 1 Cr. Mees. & Rosc. 254, 256, 257; Margetts v. Bays, 4 Ad. & El. 489; Lyall v. Higgins, 4 Ib. N. S. 528, 534, per Patteson, J. This, however, is a mere defect in form, consisting in the manner in which that which is substantial is stated in the plea; and in England can be reached only by a special demurrer. Gould v. Lasbury, Margetts v. Bays, supra. We have already had occasion to decide [Ellis, Adm’r, v. Appleby & another, 4 R. I. Rep. 469, 470) that our statute of amendments, unlike the statute of Anne, requires us to give judgment in the cause according to the very right, “without regarding any impei¿ections, defects, or want of form in the *27 writ, declaration, or other pleadings, &c.,” and does not qualify its requirement in this respect, as that statute does, by the words “ except the same shall be specially cmd particularly set down and shown for cause of demwrer.” Rev. Stats, ch. 184, §4.

By force of this statute, we can no more regard a mere defect of form, in judgment upon a special, than in judgment upon a general, demurrer; — and this demurrer must be overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ames, C. J.

This plea is defective, because, instead of expressly or silently confessing the plaintiff’s causes of action which it seeks to avoid, by the introduction of the words “ supposed causes of action in said counts mentioned, if any such there be or still are," it confesses them only hypothetically; which, in pleading, is tantamount to an'argumentative denial of them. Gould v. Lasbury, 1 Cr. Mees. & Rosc. 254, 256, 257; Margetts v. Bays, 4 Ad. & El. 489; Lyall v. Higgins, 4 Ib. N. S. 528, 534, per Patteson, J. This, however, is a mere defect in form, consisting in the manner in which that which is substantial is stated in the plea; and in England can be reached only by a special demurrer. Gould v. Lasbury, Margetts v. Bays, supra. We have already had occasion to decide [Ellis, Adm’r, v. Appleby & another, 4 R. I. Rep. 469, 470) that our statute of amendments, unlike the statute of Anne, requires us to give judgment in the cause according to the very right, “without regarding any impei¿ections, defects, or want of form in the *27 writ, declaration, or other pleadings, &c.,” and does not qualify its requirement in this respect, as that statute does, by the words “ except the same shall be specially cmd particularly set down and shown for cause of demwrer.” Rev. Stats, ch. 184, §4.

By force of this statute, we can no more regard a mere defect of form, in judgment upon a special, than in judgment upon a general, demurrer; — and this demurrer must be overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 R.I. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marchant-trustee-v-the-valley-falls-baptist-church-ri-1859.