March v. State

Texas Supreme Court

March v. State

35 Tex. 115

DecidedJuly 1, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Tex. 115 (March v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

March v. State, 35 Tex. 115 (Tex. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Ogden, J.

There is no assignment of errors in this case. We have carefully examined the record, and the briefs of counsel for appellant and appellee, and have been unable to discover any sufficient error in the trial below to authorize a reversal of the judgment.. Counsel for appellant complain that the fine assessed by the jury is excessive, and that therefore the judgment should be reversed. That was a question of fact for the jury to determine, and this court is not authorized to interfere, to control or reverse the action of the jury in that particular. The motion of the Attorney General is overruled, and the judgment of the District. Court is affirmed.

Affiemed-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ogden, J.

There is no assignment of errors in this case. We have carefully examined the record, and the briefs of counsel for appellant and appellee, and have been unable to discover any sufficient error in the trial below to authorize a reversal of the judgment.. Counsel for appellant complain that the fine assessed by the jury is excessive, and that therefore the judgment should be reversed. That was a question of fact for the jury to determine, and this court is not authorized to interfere, to control or reverse the action of the jury in that particular. The motion of the Attorney General is overruled, and the judgment of the District. Court is affirmed.

Affiemed-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Tex. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/march-v-state-tex-1872.