March v. Romare

Fifth Circuit

March v. Romare

116 F. 354, 53 C.C.A. 574, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4347

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 27, 1902

DocketNo. 1,154

StatusPublished

This text of 116 F. 354 (March v. Romare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

March v. Romare, 116 F. 354, 53 C.C.A. 574, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4347 (5th Cir. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

McCORMICK, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the circuit court for the Northern district of Alabama (114 Fed. 201) in which it wa's “ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the prayer and motion for injunction be, and the same is hereby, overruled and denied this 19th day of February, 1902.” The law in force at the time this interlocutory decree was- rendered and at this time does not authorize an appeal from such a decree. Act of congress approved June 6, 1900 (31 Stat. 1899, 1900) p. 660; Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co., 44 C. C. A. 92, 104 Fed. 622; Wire Co. v. Boyce, 44 C. C. A. 588, 104 Fed. 172; Omaha & S. W. R. Co. v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co., 45 C. C. A. 474, 106 Fed. 586; Rowan v. Ide, 46 C. C. A. 214, 107 Fed. 161.

As this court has no. jurisdiction to entertain this appeal, the 'same must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCORMICK, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the circuit court for the Northern district of Alabama (114 Fed. 201) in which it wa's “ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the prayer and motion for injunction be, and the same is hereby, overruled and denied this 19th day of February, 1902.” The law in force at the time this interlocutory decree was- rendered and at this time does not authorize an appeal from such a decree. Act of congress approved June 6, 1900 (31 Stat. 1899, 1900) p. 660; Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co., 44 C. C. A. 92, 104 Fed. 622; Wire Co. v. Boyce, 44 C. C. A. 588, 104 Fed. 172; Omaha & S. W. R. Co. v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co., 45 C. C. A. 474, 106 Fed. 586; Rowan v. Ide, 46 C. C. A. 214, 107 Fed. 161.

As this court has no. jurisdiction to entertain this appeal, the 'same must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 F. 354, 53 C.C.A. 574, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/march-v-romare-ca5-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack