Marcelyn M. Kagimu v. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 30, 1995
Docket03-95-00400-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Marcelyn M. Kagimu v. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation (Marcelyn M. Kagimu v. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcelyn M. Kagimu v. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



NO. 03-95-00400-CV



Marcelyn M. Kagimu, Appellant



v.



Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation, Appellee



FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. 160,921, HONORABLE ORLINDA L. NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING



PER CURIAM



The trial court signed a summary judgment in favor of appellee Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation ("TGSLC") on April 4, 1995. Appellant Marcelyn M. Kagimu did not file a motion for new trial, so the transcript was due in this Court on June 5, 1995. Tex. R. App. P. 54(a). The time for filing a motion for extension of time to file the transcript expired on June 20, 1995. Tex. R. App. P. 54(c). Kagimu filed her first motion for extension of time to file the transcript on July 14, 1995, twenty-four days after the deadline for filing such a motion had expired, and filed an amended motion for an extension of time on July 27, 1995. The transcript was received by the Clerk of this Court on July 27, 1995.

TGSLC moves this Court to dismiss the appeal since the transcript was not timely filed. This Court has no jurisdiction to consider a late-filed motion to extend time to file. See B.D. Click Co. v. Safari Drilling Corp., 638 S.W.2d 860, 862 (Tex. 1982). Further, in the absence of a timely-filed motion to extend, this Court has no jurisdiction to consider a transcript filed after the due date. Id.

We grant TGSLC's motion to dismiss, deny Kagimu's amended motion for extension of time to file the record, and dismiss Kagimu's original motion for extension of time. The cause is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.



Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Jones

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: August 30, 1995

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.
638 S.W.2d 860 (Texas Supreme Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marcelyn M. Kagimu v. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcelyn-m-kagimu-v-texas-guaranteed-student-loan--texapp-1995.