Marcelo Martinez-Cedillo v. William P. Barr

Ninth Circuit

Marcelo Martinez-Cedillo v. William P. Barr

923 F.3d 1162

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 16, 2019

Docket14-71742

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 923 F.3d 1162 (Marcelo Martinez-Cedillo v. William P. Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marcelo Martinez-Cedillo v. William P. Barr, 923 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

FILED FOR PUBLICATION MAY 16 2019 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCELO MARTINEZ-CEDILLO, No. 14-71742 AKA Marcelo Martinez, Agency No. A074-112-169 Petitioner,

v. ORDER

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

Before: THOMAS, Chief Circuit Judge

The motion to dismiss this appeal as moot is GRANTED, and the order

scheduling oral argument following the grant of rehearing en banc is VACATED.

The three-judge panel disposition in this case, which was designated as non-

precedential on March 13, 2019, is VACATED. The appeal is DISMISSED.

Each party will bear its own costs. This order served on the agency shall constitute

the mandate of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI