Marcelo Martinez-Cedillo v. William P. Barr

923 F.3d 1162
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 16, 2019·No. 14-71742·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FILED

FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 16 2019

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCELO MARTINEZ-CEDILLO, No. 14-71742 AKA Marcelo Martinez, Agency No. A074-112-169

Petitioner,

v. ORDER WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.

Before: THOMAS, Chief Circuit Judge The motion to dismiss this appeal as moot is GRANTED, and the order scheduling oral argument following the grant of rehearing en banc is VACATED. The three-judge panel disposition in this case, which was designated as non- precedential on March 13, 2019, is VACATED. The appeal is DISMISSED. Each party will bear its own costs. This order served on the agency shall constitute the mandate of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marcelo Martinez-Cedillo v. William P. Barr, 923 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2019).

923 F.3d 1162 (Marcelo Martinez-Cedillo v. William P. Barr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matthews v. Barr
927 F.3d 606 (Second Circuit, 2019)