Marcelo Galvan Jr. and Analicia R. Galvan v. Cledson MacEdo De Carvalho and Kristina Carvalho

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 16, 2019
Docket04-18-00747-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Marcelo Galvan Jr. and Analicia R. Galvan v. Cledson MacEdo De Carvalho and Kristina Carvalho (Marcelo Galvan Jr. and Analicia R. Galvan v. Cledson MacEdo De Carvalho and Kristina Carvalho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcelo Galvan Jr. and Analicia R. Galvan v. Cledson MacEdo De Carvalho and Kristina Carvalho, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-18-00747-CV

Marcelo GALVAN Jr. and Analicia R. Galvan, Appellants

v.

Cledson Macedo de CARVALHO and Kristina Carvalho, Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CVH001835-D1 Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 16, 2019

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On December 3, 2018, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late clerk’s record, stating

that the appellants had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a). On December 7, 2018, we ordered appellants to provide written

proof to this court by December 17, 2018 that either (1) the clerk’s fee had been paid or

arrangements had been made to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record; or (2)

appellants were entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. Appellants have not responded

to our order. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 04-18-00747-CV

37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal for want of prosecution if clerk’s record is not filed due to

appellant’s fault); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of appeal if appellant fails

to comply with an order of this court). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellants. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 43.4.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marcelo Galvan Jr. and Analicia R. Galvan v. Cledson MacEdo De Carvalho and Kristina Carvalho, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcelo-galvan-jr-and-analicia-r-galvan-v-cledson-macedo-de-carvalho-and-texapp-2019.