Home/Florida Circuit Courts/Marcellon v. Natal

Marcellon v. Natal

22 Fla. Supp. 2d 169
CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
DecidedMay 11, 1987
DocketCase No. 86-176 AP (County Court Case No. 86-620SP20)
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Fla. Supp. 2d 169 (Marcellon v. Natal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcellon v. Natal, 22 Fla. Supp. 2d 169 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1987).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Based upon the authority of Durene v. Alcime, 448 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), the award of reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party is mandatory and the trial court has no discretion to deny the award.

Accordingly, this case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for action consistent with this ruling.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Durene v. Alcime
448 So. 2d 1208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Fla. Supp. 2d 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcellon-v-natal-flacirct-1987.