Marcello v. Internal Revenue Service

414 F. App'x 560
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2011·No. No. 10-1866·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Marcello appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint against the Internal Revenue Service for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, upholding the Commissioner’s assessment of a trust fund recovery penalty against him, and reducing the assessment to judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marcello v. Internal Rev. Serv., No. 1:08-cv-02796-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 21, May 3 & Nov. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marcello v. Internal Revenue Service, 414 F. App'x 560 (4th Cir. 2011).

414 F. App'x 560 (Marcello v. Internal Revenue Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Calen v. United States
E.D. New York, 2021
Marcello v. Internal Revenue Service
181 L. Ed. 2d 351 (Supreme Court, 2011)