Marcello v. City of New York

2024 NY Slip Op 31691(U)

• Court: New York Supreme Court, New York County
• Decided: May 15, 2024
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Marcello v City of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 31691(U) May 15, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155633/2022 Judge: Hasa A. Kingo Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 155633/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. HASA A. KINGO PART 05M Justice ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------X INDEX NO. 155633/2022 PATRICIA MARCELLO, MOTION DATE 03/29/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 - V -

THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, THE NEW YORK DECISION + ORDER ON CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, MOTION

Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 were read on this motion to/for CONSOLIDATE/JOIN FOR TRIAL

Upon the foregoing documents, it is ORDERED that plaintiff Patricia Marcello's

(hereinafter "plaintiff') motion to consolidate, pursuant to CPLR §602, is granted. Plaintiff seeks

to consolidate this action, Index No.: 155633/2022 (Action #1), with a related action pending in

this court, the Supreme Court, New York County, bearing Index No.: 150127/2023 (Action #2).

Plaintiff argues that both actions arise from identical facts and circumstances, and involve common

questions of law and fact. Defendant Spectrum New York Metro LLC (hereinafter "Spectrum")

opposes the motion, contending that the temporal disparity between the commencement of each

action may prejudice Spectrum's ability to mount a proper defense in the 2023 action, which has

yet to have a preliminary conference. Spectrum maintains that its circumstances markedly differ

from those of other defendants, who have enjoyed nearly a year more for litigation.

155633/2022 MARCELLO, PATRICIA vs. THE CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL Page 1 of4 Motion No. 001

1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 155633/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2024

CPLR §602 states that "[w]hen actions involving a common question of law or fact are

pending before a court, the court, upon motion ... may order the actions consolidated." A motion

to consolidate is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court ( Gov't Employees Ins. Co. v.

Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 242 AD2d 765 [3d Dept 1997]). Consolidation can only be ordered

where there is a common question of law or fact between the two actions involved ( Gibbons v.

Groat, 22 AD2d 996 [3d Dept 1964 ]; Keenan v. American Bridge Division- United States Steel

Corp., 31 AD2d 637 [2d Dept 1968]). Absent a showing of prejudice to a substantial right by a

party opposing the motion, consolidation should be granted where common questions of fact or

law exist (Gadelov v. Shure, 273 AD2d 375 [2d Dept 2000]; Berman v. Greenwood Village

Community Dev., Inc., 156 AD2d 326 [2d Dept 1989]).

Here, it is undisputed that the actions arise out of the accident and involve the same parties.

Likewise, the witnesses in both actions are identical and the issues to be resolved are the same.

Therefore, a full consolidation of the two actions would minimize court expense, as well as the

time witnesses and parties will have to appear, and will avoid duplication of testimony and expedite

discovery. The court acknowledges the arguments regarding prejudice advanced by Spectrum, but

finds that such prejudice can be mitigated by directing plaintiff to exchange all written discovery

from the instant action with Spectrum, and by providing the parties in the subsequently filed action

the right to depose the parties from the instant action. Moreover, the court notes that a preliminary

conference has yet to be held in either action, thereby qualifying the arguments regarding prejudice

advanced by Spectrum. Considering all the arguments advanced, plaintiffs motion is granted

under the aforementioned conditions. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is granted and the above-captioned action is consolidated in

this court with PATRICIA MARCELLO vs. EMPIRE CITY SUBWAY COMPANY (LIMITED),

155633/2022 MARCELLO, PATRICIA vs. THE CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 001

2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 155633/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2024

EJM CONSULTING LLC, and SPECTRUM NEW YORK METRO, LLC, Index No.

150127/2023, pending in this court; and it is further

ORDERED that the consolidation shall take place under Index No. 155623/2022 and the

consolidated action shall bear the following caption:

----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------X

PATRICIA MARCELLO,

Plaintiff,

-v- THE CITY OF NEW YORK, THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, EMPIRE CITY SUBWAY COMPANY (LIMITED), EJM CONSUL TING LLC, and SPECTRUM NEW YORK METRO, LLC,

Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------X

; and it is further

ORDERED that the pleadings m the actions hereby consolidated shall stand as the

pleadings in the consolidated action; and it is further

ORDERED that, within 30 days from entry of this order, movant shall serve a copy of this

order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the Court, who shall consolidate the documents in the

actions hereby consolidated and shall mark his records to reflect the consolidation; and it is further

ORDERED that counsel for the movant shall contact the staff of the Clerk of the Court to

arrange for the effectuation of the consolidation hereby directed; and it is further

ORDERED that service of this order upon the Clerk of the Court shall be made in

accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk

155633/2022 MARCELLO, PATRICIA vs. THE CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 001

3 of 4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 155633/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2024

Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's

website); and it is further

ORDERED that, as applicable and insofar as is practical, the Clerk of this Court shall file

the documents being consolidated in the consolidated case file under the index number of the

consolidated action in the New York State Courts Electronic Filing System or make appropriate

notations of such documents in the e-filing records of the court so as to ensure access to the

documents in the consolidated action; and it is further

ORDERED that, within 30 days from entry of this order, movant shall serve a copy of this

order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office, who is hereby directed to

reflect the consolidation by appropriately marking the court's records; and it is further

ORDERED that such service upon the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office shall be made

in accordance with the procedures set forth in the aforesaid Protocol; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff is directed to exchange all written discovery from Index No.

155633/2022 with Spectrum, and shall provide said discovery no later than June 21, 2024; and it

is further

ORDERED that the parties to the action formerly filed under Index No. 150127/2023 shall

have the right to depose the parties under the newly consolidated Index No. 155623/2022; and it

ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to set this matter down for a preliminary conference

in the DCM Part on the next available date.

5/15/2024 DATE CHECK ONE: □ CASE DISPOSED 0 NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

0 GRANTED □ DENIED □ GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER

155633/2022 MARCELLO, PATRICIA vs. THE CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL Page4 of 4 Motion No. 001

4 of 4 [* 4]