Marcella's Appliances Sales & Services, Inc. v. General Electric Credit Corp.

76 A.D.2d 990, 429 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12115
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 19, 1980·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered February 15, 1979 in Schenectady County, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffs attempt to recover damages allegedly caused by a wrongful attachment granted during the course of a replevin action commenced by defendant must be rejected. Although it was decided that defendant was not entitled to an attachment in that action, the damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff were not proximately caused "by reason of the attachment” (CPLR 6212, subd [e]) since the court had ordered that the Sheriff retain possession of the merchandise until further court order. Moreover, the judgment, which was granted in defendant’s favor in the replevin action, determined that defendant had been entitled to possession of the merchandise at issue there (General Elec. Credit Corp. v Marcella’s Appliances Sales & Servs., 66 AD2d 927). We have examined the remaining allegations of the complaint and conclude that no causes of action are stated. Order affirmed, with costs. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Casey and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marcella's Appliances Sales & Services, Inc. v. General Electric Credit Corp., 76 A.D.2d 990, 429 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

76 A.D.2d 990 (Marcella's Appliances Sales & Services, Inc. v. General Electric Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eichberg v. Maisano
2 A.D.3d 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)