Marcell v. Engebretson

76 F.2d 876, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 2716
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 15, 1935
DocketNos. 9976, 10030
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 F.2d 876 (Marcell v. Engebretson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marcell v. Engebretson, 76 F.2d 876, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 2716 (8th Cir. 1935).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon petition of the appellee herein, this court granted a rehearing in case No. 10030. The case has been reargued, and we have considered the supplemental briefs and the arguments of counsel.

We have reached the conclusion that the court below was without jurisdiction, in a summary proceeding, to adjudicate title to the property in the possession of the appellants ; that the opinion heretofore filed herein should stand as the opinion of this court in this case; and that the decree appealed from should be reversed, with directions to dismiss the summary proceeding.

It is so ordered. ' ’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Nat. Bank of Omaha, Neb. v. Pamp
83 F.2d 493 (Eighth Circuit, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 F.2d 876, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 2716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcell-v-engebretson-ca8-1935.