Marcelius Reed v. State
This text of Marcelius Reed v. State (Marcelius Reed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 8, 2017.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-17-00589-CR
MARCELIUS REED, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 182nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1442307
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated robbery. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on August 31, 2015, to confinement for thirteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until July 19, 2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jewell. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marcelius Reed v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcelius-reed-v-state-texapp-2017.