Marcelito Militante v. Scott and Associates, Capital One N.A.
This text of Marcelito Militante v. Scott and Associates, Capital One N.A. (Marcelito Militante v. Scott and Associates, Capital One N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-26-00201-CV
Marcelito Militante, Appellant
v.
Scott and Associates, Capital One N.A., Appellees
On appeal from the Precinct 2, Place 1 of Walker County, Texas Judge Stephen P. Cole, presiding Trial Court Cause No. 4DC25-1380
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant filed a notice of appeal directly with this Court complaining of
a judgment of the justice court in a debt collection case. By letter from the
Clerk of this Court dated June 23, 2026, Appellant was notified that this
appeal is subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction because this Court does
not have jurisdiction of direct appeals from the justice court. Appellant was directed to file a response with this Court showing grounds for continuing the
appeal. Appellant did not respond.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
MATT JOHNSON Chief Justice
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: July 16, 2026 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Dismissed CV06
Militante v. Scott and Assoc. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marcelito Militante v. Scott and Associates, Capital One N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marcelito-militante-v-scott-and-associates-capital-one-na-txctapp10-2026.