Marcelino Anders Solis v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-03-0329-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
SEPTEMBER 24, 2003
______________________________
MARCELINO ANDRES SOLIS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 102,723; HONORABLE WILLIAM DODSON, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal. Although the
motion is signed only by appellant’s attorney, it is accompanied by a copy of a letter written
and signed by appellant in which he expresses his intent to dismiss his appeal.
Concluding the motion and attached letter substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion. No decision
of this Court having been delivered, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will
be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Don H. Reavis Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marcelino Anders Solis v. State (Marcelino Anders Solis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.