Marcelino Anders Solis v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 24, 2003·No. 07-03-00329-CR·Published

Opinion

NO. 07-03-0329-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

SEPTEMBER 24, 2003

______________________________

MARCELINO ANDRES SOLIS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 102,723; HONORABLE WILLIAM DODSON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal. Although the

motion is signed only by appellant’s attorney, it is accompanied by a copy of a letter written

and signed by appellant in which he expresses his intent to dismiss his appeal.

Concluding the motion and attached letter substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion. No decision

of this Court having been delivered, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will

be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Don H. Reavis Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marcelino Anders Solis v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Marcelino Anders Solis v. State (Marcelino Anders Solis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.